The war in Tianve

For all discussion directly related to ARC's in-game minor faction
User avatar
Posts: 220
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2015 9:11 pm
Ships Owned: Python

Re: The war in Tianve

Postby Frank » Fri Jan 15, 2016 4:53 pm

People chose to support the Alliance as an alternative to the other two factions I can't be the only one who wasn't happy with having Mahon foisted on me. I like the idea of working with the other Alliance groups to promote a "real Alliance" faction to the Power Play game instead of this watered-down version of the federation that we have at the moment.

I don't think it would split the Alliance vote afterwards either. If every Alliance player works to get a second Alliance Power Player into the game then I could see that character as having a lot more loyalty than Mahon.

It would have to be the Elite Diplomatic Corps (AEDC). I would be happy to provide a big push for them as long as they didn't interfere with Zaonce.
User avatar
Site Admin
Posts: 306
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2015 4:58 pm
Location: Lincolnshire, UK
Ships Owned: Python
Federal Assault Ship

Re: The war in Tianve

Postby Sealurk » Tue Jan 19, 2016 9:19 am

It looks like the war is over. ARC is not showing as at war in Tianve and there are no conflict zones. ARC influence is 29% compared to Tianve Bridge's 2%.
++ARC Communications Director++
Got an idea for a GalNet article about ARC? Submit it here.
User avatar
Site Admin
Posts: 797
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2015 7:26 am
Location: Somerset or Hampshire depending
Ships Owned: Sidewinder, Imperial Eagle, Viper mk4, Asp Explorer, Vulture, Fer de Lance, Python

Re: The war in Tianve

Postby Dayrth » Tue Jan 19, 2016 10:04 am

No more war, boo.

But we did win, HURRAH!
[Remember Wheatons Law]

Return to “ARC Minor Faction”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest